<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Last Stage of Circuit Board Design: Correcting for the Real World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neufeld.newton.ks.us/electronics/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neufeld.newton.ks.us/electronics/?p=1435</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 17:19:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Neufeld</title>
		<link>http://www.neufeld.newton.ks.us/electronics/?p=1435&#038;cpage=1#comment-30695</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Neufeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neufeld.newton.ks.us/electronics/?p=1435#comment-30695</guid>
		<description>Ross, it would make for simpler traces, but I&#039;m a believer in consistent orientation of polarized components when possible and I like to put the positive terminals on top.  In this design, the wasted traces were worth it to me.  Of course, clear, unequivocal labeling is even more important. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross, it would make for simpler traces, but I&#8217;m a believer in consistent orientation of polarized components when possible and I like to put the positive terminals on top.  In this design, the wasted traces were worth it to me.  Of course, clear, unequivocal labeling is even more important. <img src='http://www.neufeld.newton.ks.us/electronics/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.neufeld.newton.ks.us/electronics/?p=1435&#038;cpage=1#comment-30407</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 07:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neufeld.newton.ks.us/electronics/?p=1435#comment-30407</guid>
		<description>Hi Keith.

Interesting article.

One change I would make to your final layout would be to rotate 180 degrees anti-clockwise your two electrolytic caps in the top left hand corner to produce a simple trace layout.

Cheers,

Ross</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Keith.</p>
<p>Interesting article.</p>
<p>One change I would make to your final layout would be to rotate 180 degrees anti-clockwise your two electrolytic caps in the top left hand corner to produce a simple trace layout.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Ross</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Shimniok (Bot Thoughts)</title>
		<link>http://www.neufeld.newton.ks.us/electronics/?p=1435&#038;cpage=1#comment-28350</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Shimniok (Bot Thoughts)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neufeld.newton.ks.us/electronics/?p=1435#comment-28350</guid>
		<description>Great article!!  I didn&#039;t know about the DRC restring... my latest DIY board suffered from tiny pad syndrome.  PITA to solder.  Anyway great tips.

I find it&#039;s good to do enough board design to get into a rhythm of design and validation like you.

With recent boards, I start selecting components so I can 
pick correct packages in the layout either before doing layout or while.

Also, I got sick of leafing through the eleventy billion different connectors so I now standardize on .1&quot; pin headers, stock up on vertical and right angle, as well as 2-6 pin female sockets, and call it good.  

I&#039;ve forgotten holes on a number of boards :)  I now try to stick those on early.  

I usually do a first pass layout, then work on shrinking the footprint from there.  Anyway thanks for all the great tips!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!!  I didn&#8217;t know about the DRC restring&#8230; my latest DIY board suffered from tiny pad syndrome.  PITA to solder.  Anyway great tips.</p>
<p>I find it&#8217;s good to do enough board design to get into a rhythm of design and validation like you.</p>
<p>With recent boards, I start selecting components so I can<br />
pick correct packages in the layout either before doing layout or while.</p>
<p>Also, I got sick of leafing through the eleventy billion different connectors so I now standardize on .1&#8243; pin headers, stock up on vertical and right angle, as well as 2-6 pin female sockets, and call it good.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve forgotten holes on a number of boards <img src='http://www.neufeld.newton.ks.us/electronics/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I now try to stick those on early.  </p>
<p>I usually do a first pass layout, then work on shrinking the footprint from there.  Anyway thanks for all the great tips!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.neufeld.newton.ks.us/electronics/?p=1435&#038;cpage=1#comment-28258</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neufeld.newton.ks.us/electronics/?p=1435#comment-28258</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget your Z-axis!  On a project I did recently, I was going to use board mounted potentiometers.  These board mounted pots had a metal sleeve with a washer and nut.  I figured I could mount the pots to the panel with the washer and the nut, and the pots are already soldered to the board, so I don&#039;t need any mounting hardware, right?

Then I got my prototype boards back.  Turns out I forgot to take into account the height of the capacitors, and I couldn&#039;t mount those pots to anything but the thinnest of metal.  Also I wired one of the pots backwards, and since it was a board mounted pot it wasn&#039;t so easy to fix.

Had to switch to external mount pots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget your Z-axis!  On a project I did recently, I was going to use board mounted potentiometers.  These board mounted pots had a metal sleeve with a washer and nut.  I figured I could mount the pots to the panel with the washer and the nut, and the pots are already soldered to the board, so I don&#8217;t need any mounting hardware, right?</p>
<p>Then I got my prototype boards back.  Turns out I forgot to take into account the height of the capacitors, and I couldn&#8217;t mount those pots to anything but the thinnest of metal.  Also I wired one of the pots backwards, and since it was a board mounted pot it wasn&#8217;t so easy to fix.</p>
<p>Had to switch to external mount pots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
